The protest, which has a proper permit to occur, will gather across the street from the NYC Hilton to show Dr. Gerberding, the CDC, the media and the public that SHE is not deserving of such an honor due to the apparent fraudulent work she condoned while at the CDC by hiding and promoting false vaccine research, which CDC epidemiologist whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, pointed out and informed her about. Gerberding, however, neutralized Thompson, the lead researcher on that project, and turned the project over to Dr. Frank DeStefano, who apparently, and obligingly, promulgated the fraud further to Gerberding’s apparent instructions and an observably planned agenda. It was Coleen Boyle, PhD, who reported directly to Dr. Gerberding, who apparently gave the orders to Thompson’s team to discard the MMR data implicating that vaccine’s involvement in Autism in young black boys less than three years of age!
Speakers at the May 3rd protest include Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD; Brandy Vaughn, former Merck Sales Rep; and others. The VAXXED documentary film crew will be on hand to film the event.
Anyone attending the above event is asked to wear the colors red, black and white in order to show a visual plus unifying solidarity.
Dr. Julie Gerberding, MD, was CDC’s Director  until she resigned and then ‘advanced’ on to the job of Merck & Company’s Vaccine Division PRESIDENT, proving the “revolving door culture” that exists between Big Pharma and federal health agencies, especially FDA and the CDC.
CDC epidemiologist and whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, tells how he went to Dr. Gerberding telling her what was going on with the study finding autism implications in young black boys less than three years of age.
Dr. Thompson was the lead researcher on that project. Therefore, he was supposed to deliver the findings at a conference. He was pulled from the project; it was given to Dr. Frank DeStefano, who delivered the results at the conference, while the rest of the story is divulged in the documentary VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe.
That fraud committed by the CDC, and revealed by Dr. Thompson, happened on Julie Gerberding’s watch!
The Mary and Sallie Blog Talk Radio Show About Protesting Dr. Gerberding’s Award
Former CDC Director that Approved Gardasil Vaccine and Became Head of Merck’s Vaccine Division Named “Woman of the Year”
There’s an old adage that states, “Figures don’t lie, but liars figure.” Well, it seems the CDC is having trouble figuring out the latest statistics regarding Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and has put off its latest stats report, which was to have been released March 30, 2018!
According to Big League Politics, there’s trouble at CDC on trying to agree on the latest ASD statistics, so their report will be postponed until they can agree on “consensus science” [1, 2] rather than actual, factual science sometime in late April or May.
Serious number crunching may have to take place since two previous CDC reports stated one in 68 U.S. children suffer with autism, whereas, independent reports place the figure at one in 36!
According to Big League Politics,
The new report is now expected to change the criteria for judging what constitutes autism.
The numbers currently rely on so-called DSM IV codes for determining mental health disorders.
The new report is set to switch to using updated DSM V codes, according to insiders.
Ah, reminiscent shades of what “colluders” and “consensus science” apparently did in reclassifying polio a couple of times in order to report favorable ‘efficacy’ rates for polio vaccines but, furthermore, to deflect from the reality that the oral polio vaccine given by the Gates Foundation in India actually caused 47,500 cases of polio, which “consensus science” renamed and classified as “Acute Flaccid Paralysis” – not polio after receiving the polio vaccine! Oh the semantic games they play!
Will the new Autism report eventually wind up experiencing the past histories of other ‘statistical’ reports, e.g.:
Of course, there’s the CDC accepting and reporting fraudulent vaccine efficacies to the world-at-large:
The still-unsettled, and unsettling, qui tam court case in Philadelphia Federal Court in which Merck and Company is charged by two employees with fudging the Mumps active in their MMR vaccine for about ten years, to the point of adding rabbit blood antibodies to get a 100% efficacy rate! (Source)
Will CDC’s past statistical shenanigans become prologue for the new Autism statistics?
A special 30 minute edition of Sacrificial Virgins (which was originally produced last year as a film trilogy) was screened earlier in the day. It was followed by a lively Q&A that focused on how such an important issue has largely been swept under the carpet by the medical establishment and mainstream media.
Sacrificial Virgins investigates widespread global concerns over the safety of the controversial vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix, which are prescribed to millions of girls (and now boys) in nationwide mass vaccination programmes across the world.
The vaccines are coming under increasing fire for their association with widespread, severe neurological damage and the charge that they may not even be capable of preventing the cervical cancers for which they are usually prescribed.
Sacrificial Virgins writer and narrator Joan Shenton said:
It was a wonderfully proud moment for us all when Andi stepped up to receive the Special Jury Prize for the film work he directed.
Our hope is that Sacrificial Virgins will have a tremendous social impact by helping to prevent countless girls and boys around the world from going through the torment endured by the young women we interviewed in the films.
We do not want to see more young lives lost or ruined.
Gardasil and Cervarix vaccinate against a common virus, the Human Papilloma Virus or HPV.
The ability of the vaccines to prevent HPV infection is established but Sacrificial Virgins challenges the claim by the vaccine’s advocates that HPV causes the majority of cervical cancers in later life and that, therefore, vaccination against HPV is a vaccination against such cancers.
The film meticulously picks apart this claim to show there is no scientific proof that HPV causes such cancers.
It questions the justification for the public health risk associated with large-scale HPV vaccination programmes, while also advancing compelling scientific evidence (involving hitherto untried combinations of aluminium adjuvant in these vaccines) for the link between the vaccines and neurological damage.