Influenza: marketing vaccine by marketing disease

The CDC pledges “To base all public health decisions on the highest quality scientific data.” In the case of influenza vaccinations and their marketing, this is not so. Promotion of influenza vaccines is one of the most visible and aggressive public health policies today. Although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza appears overstated.

Twenty years ago, in 1990, 32 million doses of influenza vaccine were available in the United States. Today [the number is] around 135 million doses. This enormous growth has not been fueled by popular demand but instead by a public health campaign. Drug companies have long known that to sell some products, you would have to first sell people on the disease. In the 1950s and 1960s, Merck launched an extensive campaign to lower the diagnostic threshold for hypertension, and in doing so enlarging the market for its diuretic drug, Diuril. Could influenza … be yet one more case of disease mongering? Marketing influenza vaccines … involves marketing influenza as a threat of great proportions.

The CDC’s website explains that “Flu seasons … can be severe,” citing a death toll of “3000 to a high of about 49000 people.” However, a far less volatile and more reassuring picture of influenza seems likely if one considers that recorded deaths from influenza declined sharply over the middle of the 20th century … all before the great expansion of vaccination campaigns in the 2000s. Yet across the country, mandatory influenza vaccination policies have cropped up … precisely because not everyone wants the vaccination, and compulsion appears the only way to achieve high vaccination rates.

Note: Read the entire revealing article at this link. The author clearly shows how fear and profit are the driving force behind flu vaccines and not good science and health. And this US government webpage states, “Since 1988, over 18,897 petitions have been filed with the VICP. Over that 29-year time period, 16,857 petitions have been adjudicated, with 5,782 of those determined to be compensable. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $3.7 billion.” For other verifiable information on health corruption, see the excellent, reliable resources provided in our Health Information Center.

Flu vaccine paradox adds to public health debate

People who receive flu vaccines year after year can sometimes show reduced protection, an effect that Canadian infectious disease specialists say muddies public health messages for annual flu vaccine campaigns.

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, researchers at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control originally thought seasonal flu shots from 2008 might offer extra protection. They were puzzled to find instead, seasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu. Dr. Danuta Skowronski and her colleagues went on to do five more studies during the summer that showed the same effect in people and in ferrets, which are considered the best animal model of flu. What was originally called “the Canadian problem” has since been found in a randomized control trial by researchers in Hong Kong … Japan and the U.S. Researchers in several countries have found a blunting or “interference” effect between previous seasonal vaccines and reduced levels of vaccine protection in later years. “People do not have a good explanation for why,” said Dr. Michael Gardam, director of infection prevention and control at Toronto’s University Health Network. “We have kind of hyped this vaccine so much for so long we are starting to believe our own hype. Really, what we should be doing is looking for better vaccines,” Gardam said. In the meantime, public health officials who aim to protect people from flu complications need to grapple with the imperfections of a vaccine given every year to a moving target of strains.

Note: Healthcare workers in New York protested the government mandate that they be given this vaccine, from which drug companies made billions of dollars. For more, see concise summaries of deeply revealing news articles about the mysterious an

How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders?

They’re some of the most trusted voices in the defense of vaccine safety: the American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child By Two, and pediatrician Dr. Paul Offit. But CBS News has found these three have something more in common – strong financial ties to the industry whose products they promote and defend. The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education classes and even helped build their headquarters. The totals are kept secret, but public documents reveal bits and pieces. A $342,000 payment from Wyeth, maker of the pneumococcal vaccine – which makes $2 billion a year in sales. A $433,000 contribution from Merck, the same year the academy endorsed Merck’s HPV vaccine – which made $1.5 billion a year in sales. Every Child By Two, a group that promotes early immunization for all children, admits the group takes money from the vaccine industry, too – but wouldn’t tell us how much. Then there’s Paul Offit, perhaps the most widely-quoted defender of vaccine safety. He’s gone so far as to say babies can tolerate “10,000 vaccines at once.” In fact, he’s a vaccine industry insider. Offit holds in a $1.5 million dollar research chair at Children’s Hospital, funded by Merck. He holds the patent on an anti-diarrhea vaccine he developed with Merck. And future royalties for the vaccine were just sold for $182 million cash.

Note: An excellent report endorsed by dozens of respected doctors and nurses reveals the serious risks of vaccines. Read an excellent list of questions on the usefulness of vaccines that are rarely raised by the media. This US government webpage states, “Since 1988, over 18,897 petitions have been filed with the VICP [Vaccine Injury Compensation Program] … with 5,205 of those determined to be compensable. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $3.7 billion.” Why isn’t that $3.7 billion price tag for vaccine injuries being talked about?

Study: Rate of American Boys Developing Neurodevelopmental Disorders a National Crisis

At least one in six American children (roughly 17%) has a diagnosed developmental disability. No matter which once-rare disorder one considers—learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), tics, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or emotional disturbances—each has witnessed a dramatic escalation over the past several decades. A systematic literature review recently published in Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis contends that these trends are at crisis proportions.
The crisis is spiraling out of control, with society-wide impacts on services, institutions, families and, especially, boys. There are at least two boys for every girl with a neurodevelopmental disorder. For ASD and ADHD, the male-to-female ratio is roughly four and five to one, respectively. Genetics cannot explain this consistent sex-specific pattern.
What can explain it is children’s vastly increased exposure to and bioaccumulation of chemical neurotoxins at the same time that the explosion in neurodevelopmental disorders has unfolded. In fact, the skewed sex ratio is, in and of itself, a vital clue that can help pinpoint major causes of neurodevelopmental disorders. Unfortunately, research funding priorities in the U.S. are highly distorted, as the field of ASD research illustrates. In 2013, the federal government awarded more than 38 times as much funding ($291 million) to ASD researchers studying genetics as to those studying ASD’s environmental aspects ($7.5 million)—even though genetics “only addresses at best about 20% of the ASD population.”
Read More…

No Safety Tests for Vaccine Cocktails for Children

Vaccines are tested one at a time and no consideration is given to the fact that they are injected simultaneously. They are also not tested with a genuine placebo (i.e. water or a sugar pill) – instead another vaccine is used as a placebo, or a noxious substance like aluminium that is capable of causing multiple side-effects.

Completely unvaccinated children are never used as a comparison because medical authorities say it would be ‘unethical’ to withhold vaccines from them. This is despite the fact that there are thousands of unvaccinated children around including my own who would be more than willing to be a comparison. Because they will not have a genuine study of the health of vaccinated and totally unvaccinated children.

When the term ‘unvaccinated’ is used in studies it refers to one specific vaccine, for instance, the child is unvaccinated for MMR (but had DTaP/IPV/Hib etc), or it can refer to people who were previously vaccinated who no longer show any antibodies. Study researchers will even exclude children from their study results or refer to them as ‘unvaccinated’ if they get the disease they were vaccinated for within two weeks of the shot or if they die.

(American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 149, number 4, 15th February 1999, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1995;14:203-9, Journal of Epidemiology 2005;34:149–151, MMWR. 2004;53:707-710, New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 347, number 24, December 12th 2002, International Journal of Epidemiology, volume 19, number 4, 1990, Epidemiological studies of the non-specific effects of vaccines: II –
methodological issues in the design and analysis of cohort studies, Open University, N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1397-1402, November 24, 1994).

There have been a couple of studies looking at risk factors for allergy that weren’t specifically about vaccines that looked at the health of Steiner children (a large proportion of whom are unvaccinated and use alternative medicine) and they found that they have less allergies and fewer doctor visits.

Another problem is that when researchers test whether a new vaccine causes any more disease than in the normal population they don’t test disease rates against unvaccinated children, they test them against the general population. Since the vast majority of the public are vaccinated, they are essentially testing the study group against itself. If the rest of the population are neurologically damaged, it’s not going to seem as if the test vaccines cause a spike in neurological illnesses.

Pharma Co Has License Suspended as Vaccine Blamed For Sterilization of 500,000 Women & Children

Pharma Co Has License Suspended as Vaccine Blamed For Sterilization of 500,000 Women & Children

A state-sponsored forced sterilization on a massive scale has allegedly taken place in Africa according to opposition leaders and the public who are railing against the government. An industrial pharmaceutical laboratory has since had its license suspended by the Kenya Accreditation Service as a result of the controversy.

Narcolepsy Following Pandemrix Influenza Vaccination in Europe

An increased risk of narcolepsy was found following vaccination with Pandemrix, a monovalent 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine that was used in several European countries during the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Narcolepsy is a chronic neurological disorder caused by the brain’s inability to regulate sleep-wake cycles normally. This risk was initially found in Finland, and then some other European countries also detected an association. Most recently, scientists at the United Kingdom’s (UK) Health Protection Agency (HPA) have found evidence of an association between Pandemrix and narcolepsy in children in England. The findings are consistent with studies from Finland and other countries.

Pandemrix is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline in Europe and was specifically produced for pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza. It was not used before 2009, and has not been used since the influenza pandemic season (2009-2010). It contains an oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant called ASO3. Adjuvants are substances added to a vaccine to increase the body’s immune response to that vaccine.

Pandemrix was not licensed for use in the United States.

In response to the events in Europe, CDC reviewed data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) and found no indication of any association between U.S.-licensed H1N1 or seasonal influenza vaccine and narcolepsy.

In 2014, CDC published a study on the association between 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccines, 2010/2011 seasonal influenza vaccines, and narcolepsy. The analysis included more than 650,000 people who received the pandemic flu vaccine in 2009 and over 870,000 people who received the seasonal flu vaccine in 2010/2011. The study found that vaccination was not associated with an increased risk for narcolepsy.

CDC recommends influenza vaccination as the best way to protect from influenza disease and its complications. See CDC influenza vaccine recommendations.

Flu vaccine BOMBSHELL: 630% more “aerosolized flu virus particles” emitted by people who received flu shots… flu vaccines actually SPREAD the flu

Natural News) A bombshell new scientific study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) finds that people who receive flu shots emit 630% more flu virus particles into the air, compared to non-vaccinated individuals. In effect, this finding documents evidence that flu vaccines spread the flu, and that so-called “herd immunity” is a medical hoax because “the herd” is actually transformed into carriers and spreaders of influenza.

The bombshell finding is documented in a study entitled Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community. The study authors are Jing Yan, Michael Grantham, Jovan Pantelic, P. Jacob Bueno de Mesquita, Barbara Albert, Fengjie Liu, Sheryl Ehrman, Donald K. Milton and EMIT Consortium.

Details of this bombshell study have been revealed by Sayer Ji at Green Med Info, a site that’s rapidly becoming one of the world’s most authoritative sources on intelligent analysis of real science. Green Med Info has published 500 studies that document the adverse effects (and injury) of vaccines. Find that extensive list at this link.

630% more aerosolized flu virus particles shed by vaccinated individuals

The study, which examined 355 volunteers who were sick with flu-like symptoms, found that people who previously received flu shots emitted sharply higher quantities of flu virus particles that can infect other people. From the study:

Fine-aerosol viral RNA was also positively associated with having influenza vaccination for both the current and prior season… We provide overwhelming evidence that humans generate infectious aerosols and quantitative data to improve mathematical models of transmission and public health interventions… Our observation of an association between repeated vaccination and increased viral aerosol generation demonstrated the power of our method, but needs confirmation.

Shockingly, people who received prior flu shot vaccinations were found to emit 6.3 times (or 630%) the number of flu virus particles emitted by non-vaccinated individuals.

This means — prepare yourself for this realization — that the most responsible way to avoid infecting other people is to AVOID being vaccinated with flu shots.

People are receive flu shots, in other words, are irresponsible spreaders of the flu. They’re the ones making other people sick, just as we’ve observed for years.

Fig. 2 from the study: Viral shedding: (A) infectious influenza virus (fluorescent focus counts) in NP swabs and fine aerosols and (B) RNA copies in NP swabs, coarse, and fine aerosols. (C and D) Scatter plots and Spearman correlation coefficients of infectious virus plotted against RNA copies for (C) NP swabs and for (D) fine-aerosol samples. (E) The effect of day after symptom onset on RNA copies observed in NP swabs, coarse, and fine aerosols plotted as GM adjusted for missing data using Tobit analysis with error bars denoting 95% CIs. (F–H) The effect of cough frequency on RNA copies observed in (F) NP swabs, (G) coarse aerosols, and (H) in fine aerosols. Coarse: aerosol droplets >5 µm; Fine: aerosol droplets ≤5 µm in aerodynamic diameter.

M.D. “We Have No Idea What is in Vaccines”

We physicians, nurses and clinics (and hospital staff) often have no idea what are the ingredients in vaccines. We tend to not take the time to read the wordy product information sheet. Shame on us. But what should frighten us caregivers is the fact that many of those vaccines contain ingredients that are known …

List Of Doctors Who Say Vaccines Harm!

1. Dr. Nancy Banks –

2. Dr. Russell Blaylock –

3. Dr. Shiv Chopra –

4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny –

5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries –

6. Dr. Larry Palevsky –

7. Dr. Toni Bark –

8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield –

9. Dr. Meryl Nass –

10. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot –

11. Dr. Robert Rowen –

12. Dr. David Ayoub –

13. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD –

14. Dr. Rashid Buttar –

15. Dr. Roby Mitchell –

16. Dr. Ken Stoller –

17. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein –

18. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD –

19. Dr. David Davis –

20. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych –

21. Dr. Gwen Olsen –

22. Dr. Leonard Coldwell –

23. Dr. RC Tent –

24. Dr. Rebecca Carley –

25. Dr. Andrew Moulden –

26. Dr. Terry Wahls –

27. Many doctors talking at once –

28. Dr. John Regen Virapen –

29. Dr Deirdre Little- the hidden truth of HPV vaccines & their devastating effects-does anyone need gardasil?

30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff –

31. Dr. Harold E Buttram –…

32. Dr. Kelly Brogan –…

33. Dr. John Bergman –…

34. Dr. Paul

FDA’s own website that openly admits vaccines are linked to autism. This document, an insert sheet for the Tripedia vaccine, openly admits to the vaccine being linked to “idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea.”

Document –…

If they remove it here is a copy-… Big Pharma News- 24 hour update


Dr Deirdre Little- the hidden truth of HPV vaccines & their devastating effects-does anyone need gardasil?

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on the Gardasil Vaccine Hoax

Do Vaccines Cause Autism?

FDA Vaccine Insert Lists Autism as Adverse Reaction

Gardasil HPV vaccine exposed by neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock.…

Shots in the dark: silence on vaccine…

Silent epidemic the untold story of vaccines…

The greater good…

Trace Amounts official trailer

Vaccine nations…

Vaccination the hidden truth…

Vaccines the true weapons of mass destruction…

VAXXED – De la Acoperire la Catastrofă (2016)