GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!
GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!GET VACCINATED!
Do you realize that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines do not require clinical approval? It’s the vaccine that gets approval—that’s the technicality as delineated by various independent vaccine researchers!
That being said, aluminum is a nerve toxin with neurotoxic adverse effects and probable “cause and effect” associations for various diseases, most notably Multiple Sclerosis, where the myelin sheath is destroyed.
Another life-altering disease, as clinically established by French researchers and doctors at Henri Mondor Hospital in Paris, France, is MMF (Macrophagic Myofasciitis, a rare muscle disease) which Henri Mondor has become a focal research center for due to researchers there confirming the findings that aluminum in vaccines is the apparent “cause and effect,” especially high-aluminum-adjuvant vaccines like a HPV (Human papilloma virus) vaccine, which have caused severe life-altering, adverse health reactions in young girls, and boys too!
Each 0.5-mL dose of the vaccine also contains approximately 500 mcg of aluminum (provided as AAHS), 9.56 mg of sodium chloride, 0.78 mg of L-histidine, 50 mcg of polysorbate 80, 35 mcg of sodium borate, <7 mcg yeast protein, and water for injection.
Researchers at Mondor notified the U.S. CDC that MMF may be caused by vaccines/vaccinations. I wonder what the CDC did with that research.
Aluminum hydroxide is the most popular of four formulations of aluminum that can be used in vaccines. It was made available in 1927, when it was ‘thought’ to be ‘safe’ with no updated scientific safety studies! Talk about modern medicine and pharmacology living in the past, but propagandizing they are “state of the art” medicine!
Historically, aluminum seems to have gotten a “clean slate” which, like the microwave industry, relies on antiquated documentation because recent research would declare both microwaves and aluminum as neurotoxins! Here’s some of that ancient aluminum research, which needs updating in the minds of big business:
In 1997 the aluminum adjuvant was tested in the USA using a radioactive isotope of aluminum injected into TWO rabbits and then measuring the level of radioactive aluminum the rabbits excreted in their urine. After 28 days, only 6% of the aluminum was excreted; 94% remained in the rabbits! Now here’s the apparent skullduggery involved in that research: Researchers “lost” the rabbits bones, the biological site where aluminum is stored, and it is suggested the bones were destroyed! Two rabbits; 28 day study with no further research and no one can find the specimens, which should have been catalogued. Interesting? Another story based upon the above rabbits is that the World Health Organization apparently compounded the aluminum adjuvant problem further by applying the two-rabbit-28-day-research to humans, which only muddied the ‘science’ that much further.
Aluminum, or aluminium as known elsewhere, is a very biologically reactive material, which needs to be removed from vaccines, medicine, and the chemical mix being sprayed in Solar Radiation Management (SRM) aka “chemtrails”.
However, Henri Mondor researchers have documented—and catalogued—a library of aluminum and MMF patients’ information. As a result, that hospital has gained the reputation as an expert resource for researching both. Researchers at Mondor have been taking biopsies of deltoid muscles, where vaccines usually are given, and found aluminum lodged within those muscles, plus those patients biopsied also presented MMF symptoms and deteriorating health, often for numerous years without proper diagnoses!
Historically, there was a time when French vaccine maker Pasteur Institute used a safe and aluminum-free adjuvant in its vaccines? What happened? Sanofi purchased Pasteur and…
Calcium phosphate: a substitute for aluminum adjuvants?
The Philippines stated on Friday that the anti-dengue vaccine Dengvaxia may be connected to three deaths in the country, according to a government-ordered inquiry, and that the drug is not ready for mass immunization.
Sanofi the drug maker revealed in November that Dengvaxia – the world’s first dengue vaccine – might increase the risk of severe disease in people who had never been exposed to the virus. This news aroused an uproar in the Philippines, where more than 800,000 school-age children had been vaccinated with the drug in 2016 alone.
Dengue comes from mosquitoes and is the world’s fastest-growing infectious disease, tormenting up to 100 million people worldwide, causing half a million life-threatening infections and killing about 20,000 people, mostly children, every year, Yahoo News reported.
Dengvaxia uses the yellow fever virus vaccine as its genetic backbone. To induce an immune response to dengue, certain yellow fever genes were swapped out for dengue genes.
The Philippine Health Ministry halted Dengvaxia immunizations in November after it formed a 10-member panel of experts to determine if the immunization by the drug was directly connected to the deaths of 14 children after they were given the vaccine.
The panel found it may have been connected to the deaths of three.
“Three cases were found to have a casual association. They died of dengue even though they were given Dengvaxia. Two of them may have died because of vaccine failure,” Health Undersecretary Enrique Domingo told a news conference.
“These findings strengthen the decision of the Department of Health to stop the vaccine. It has failed in some children. Dengvaxia is not ready for mass vaccinations and we would need three to five more years to watch and monitor if there would be other adverse reactions from the vaccine.”
The panel recommended further studies as it was difficult to directly connect the three deaths to Dengvaxia, Juliet Sio-Aguilar, from the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital said.
The vaccine maker responded in a statement:
“We sympathize with all the families who have suffered the loss of a child. Sanofi Pasteur’s mission is to reduce or eliminate suffering for millions around the world through vaccination, including in the Philippines,” a spokesman for the French drugmaker said in an emailed statement to Newsweek.
“In Dengvaxia clinical trials conducted over more than a decade and the over one million doses of the vaccine administered, no deaths related to the vaccine have been reported to us,” the company further stated.
Meanwhile, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd and U.S. government scientists are working on a “safer” alternative to Sanofi’s Dengvaxia, Reuters reported.
Although to trust them as well would be foolish, as history shows this isn’t the first time vaccines have injured its takers or killed them.
In September the CDC announced there might be a link between miscarriages and vaccinations. The researchers found that women who had miscarriages between 2010 and 2012 were more likely to have had back-to-back annual flu shots including the swine flu vaccine that a UK court ruled caused brain damage and Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) in multiple kids in 2015.
Then who can forget the infamous medical scandal that is the polio vaccine that cost people their lives and caused cancer? This was all admitted by the CDC themselves on its now-deleted page of their website, resurrected thanks to Archive.org’s time machine. Also, here’s more evidence that SV40 has been detected in some human tumors.
A case in an Italian court in September 2014 “ruled mercury and aluminum in vaccines cause autism” and awarded a plaintiff’s family compensation for their young boy who developed autism from a six-in-one hexavalent vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. GSK even admits INFANRIX Hexa can cause several deadly illnesses but insists that its risk-benefit profile “continues to be favorable.” In 2013, two kids were awarded by the vaccine court with millions confirming the MMR vaccine causes autism.
Japan previously found out that the HPV Gardasil shot caused several serious side effects banning the vaccination from being administered to its women and sold on its markets. Those side effects included seizures, brain damage, blindness, paralysis, speech problems, pancreatitis and short-term memory loss, while another patient even died after taking the vaccine. Earlier this year, a Chinese watchdog group, Medwatcher Japan, indicted Gardasil, while a former Merck employee called the drug the “greatest medical scandal of all time.”
The full extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed: everyone knew when this vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be worthless. Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was one of the first to blow the whistle, pointing out the fraud and scam of it all. I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers. Gardasil is useless and costs a fortune! In addition, decision-makers at all levels are aware of it! Cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, paralysis of the lower limbs, vaccine-induced MS and vaccine-induced encephalitis can be found, whatever the vaccine. — Dr. Bernard Dalbergue (former Merck employee)
In 1993, Japan also banned the MMR vaccination after 1.8 million children had been given two types of MMR and a record number developed non-viral meningitis and other adverse reactions. The figures included autism and three deaths, while other children were left with permanent handicaps ranging from damaged hearing and blindness to loss of control of limbs.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has frequently brought up the link between autism and the MMR vaccine saying “it’s the preservative Thiomersal in the vaccines that causes autism.” He also wrote a piece weighing in on the CDC whistleblower entitled – “CDC’s Latest Tuskegee Experiment – African American Autism and Vaccines.”
Thiomersal isn’t the only ingredient in vaccines. They even put traces of aluminum, which is classified as a neurotoxin to the body and admitted that “despite using it for 90 years medical sciences understanding about using aluminum as a vaccine adjuvant is remarkably poor.” Do you think maybe the aluminum and mercury going into the bloodstream is causing brain problems, autism and other dysfunctions and now miscarriages within the body, or it’s just a coincidence knowing that aluminum and mercury is poisonous? The best practice is abstinence from vaccinations and to live a free natural lifestyle rather than to be Big Pharma’s lab rat. It’s surprising no one has grown an extra limb by now.
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue. ~ US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health said.
In December of last year, researchers proposed in a study that autism might be caused by aluminum in vaccines used as an adjuvant.
So you can see there is a history of adverse effects after receiving several vaccinations and the problem is not just isolated to the Dengvaxia vaccination. Although each case has different variables, all of them combined show that being a human guinea pig for Big Pharma is dangerous and vaccines affect each person differently.
In the midst of the worst drug epidemic in American history, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to keep addictive opioids off U.S. streets was derailed – that according to Joe Rannazzisi, one of the most important whistleblowers ever interviewed by 60 Minutes. Rannazzisi ran the DEA’s Office of Diversion Control, the division that regulates and investigates the pharmaceutical industry. He says the opioid crisis was allowed to spread – aided by Congress, lobbyists, and a drug distribution industry that shipped, almost unchecked, hundreds of millions of pills to rogue pharmacies and pain clinics providing the rocket fuel for a crisis that, over the last two decades, has claimed 200,000 lives.
His greatest ire is reserved for the … middlemen that ship the pain pills from manufacturers, like Purdue Pharma and Johnson & Johnson to drug stores all over the country. Rannazzisi accuses the distributors of fueling the opioid epidemic. “This is an industry that allowed millions and millions of drugs to go into bad pharmacies and doctors’ offices, that distributed them out to people who had no legitimate need for those drugs,” [said Rannazzisi]. In 2013, Joe Rannazzisi and his DEA investigators were trying to crack down. Then … with the help of members of Congress, the drug industry began to quietly pave the way for legislation that essentially would strip the DEA of its … ability to immediately freeze suspicious shipments of prescription narcotics to keep drugs off U.S. streets.
Note: See also this informative Washington Post article for more information on this sad topic. Lots more available here. For more along these lines, see concise summaries of deeply revealing news articles on corruption in government and in pharmaceutical industry.
The CDC pledges “To base all public health decisions on the highest quality scientific data.” In the case of influenza vaccinations and their marketing, this is not so. Promotion of influenza vaccines is one of the most visible and aggressive public health policies today. Although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza appears overstated.
Twenty years ago, in 1990, 32 million doses of influenza vaccine were available in the United States. Today [the number is] around 135 million doses. This enormous growth has not been fueled by popular demand but instead by a public health campaign. Drug companies have long known that to sell some products, you would have to first sell people on the disease. In the 1950s and 1960s, Merck launched an extensive campaign to lower the diagnostic threshold for hypertension, and in doing so enlarging the market for its diuretic drug, Diuril. Could influenza … be yet one more case of disease mongering? Marketing influenza vaccines … involves marketing influenza as a threat of great proportions.
The CDC’s website explains that “Flu seasons … can be severe,” citing a death toll of “3000 to a high of about 49000 people.” However, a far less volatile and more reassuring picture of influenza seems likely if one considers that recorded deaths from influenza declined sharply over the middle of the 20th century … all before the great expansion of vaccination campaigns in the 2000s. Yet across the country, mandatory influenza vaccination policies have cropped up … precisely because not everyone wants the vaccination, and compulsion appears the only way to achieve high vaccination rates.
Note: Read the entire revealing article at this link. The author clearly shows how fear and profit are the driving force behind flu vaccines and not good science and health. And this US government webpage states, “Since 1988, over 18,897 petitions have been filed with the VICP. Over that 29-year time period, 16,857 petitions have been adjudicated, with 5,782 of those determined to be compensable. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $3.7 billion.” For other verifiable information on health corruption, see the excellent, reliable resources provided in our Health Information Center.
People who receive flu vaccines year after year can sometimes show reduced protection, an effect that Canadian infectious disease specialists say muddies public health messages for annual flu vaccine campaigns.
During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, researchers at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control originally thought seasonal flu shots from 2008 might offer extra protection. They were puzzled to find instead, seasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu. Dr. Danuta Skowronski and her colleagues went on to do five more studies during the summer that showed the same effect in people and in ferrets, which are considered the best animal model of flu. What was originally called “the Canadian problem” has since been found in a randomized control trial by researchers in Hong Kong … Japan and the U.S. Researchers in several countries have found a blunting or “interference” effect between previous seasonal vaccines and reduced levels of vaccine protection in later years. “People do not have a good explanation for why,” said Dr. Michael Gardam, director of infection prevention and control at Toronto’s University Health Network. “We have kind of hyped this vaccine so much for so long we are starting to believe our own hype. Really, what we should be doing is looking for better vaccines,” Gardam said. In the meantime, public health officials who aim to protect people from flu complications need to grapple with the imperfections of a vaccine given every year to a moving target of strains.
Note: Healthcare workers in New York protested the government mandate that they be given this vaccine, from which drug companies made billions of dollars. For more, see concise summaries of deeply revealing news articles about the mysterious an
They’re some of the most trusted voices in the defense of vaccine safety: the American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child By Two, and pediatrician Dr. Paul Offit. But CBS News has found these three have something more in common – strong financial ties to the industry whose products they promote and defend. The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education classes and even helped build their headquarters. The totals are kept secret, but public documents reveal bits and pieces. A $342,000 payment from Wyeth, maker of the pneumococcal vaccine – which makes $2 billion a year in sales. A $433,000 contribution from Merck, the same year the academy endorsed Merck’s HPV vaccine – which made $1.5 billion a year in sales. Every Child By Two, a group that promotes early immunization for all children, admits the group takes money from the vaccine industry, too – but wouldn’t tell us how much. Then there’s Paul Offit, perhaps the most widely-quoted defender of vaccine safety. He’s gone so far as to say babies can tolerate “10,000 vaccines at once.” In fact, he’s a vaccine industry insider. Offit holds in a $1.5 million dollar research chair at Children’s Hospital, funded by Merck. He holds the patent on an anti-diarrhea vaccine he developed with Merck. And future royalties for the vaccine were just sold for $182 million cash.
Note: An excellent report endorsed by dozens of respected doctors and nurses reveals the serious risks of vaccines. Read an excellent list of questions on the usefulness of vaccines that are rarely raised by the media. This US government webpage states, “Since 1988, over 18,897 petitions have been filed with the VICP [Vaccine Injury Compensation Program] … with 5,205 of those determined to be compensable. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $3.7 billion.” Why isn’t that $3.7 billion price tag for vaccine injuries being talked about?
Vaccines are tested one at a time and no consideration is given to the fact that they are injected simultaneously. They are also not tested with a genuine placebo (i.e. water or a sugar pill) – instead another vaccine is used as a placebo, or a noxious substance like aluminium that is capable of causing multiple side-effects.
Completely unvaccinated children are never used as a comparison because medical authorities say it would be ‘unethical’ to withhold vaccines from them. This is despite the fact that there are thousands of unvaccinated children around including my own who would be more than willing to be a comparison. Because they will not have a genuine study of the health of vaccinated and totally unvaccinated children.
When the term ‘unvaccinated’ is used in studies it refers to one specific vaccine, for instance, the child is unvaccinated for MMR (but had DTaP/IPV/Hib etc), or it can refer to people who were previously vaccinated who no longer show any antibodies. Study researchers will even exclude children from their study results or refer to them as ‘unvaccinated’ if they get the disease they were vaccinated for within two weeks of the shot or if they die.
(American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 149, number 4, 15th February 1999, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1995;14:203-9, Journal of Epidemiology 2005;34:149–151, MMWR. 2004;53:707-710, New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 347, number 24, December 12th 2002, International Journal of Epidemiology, volume 19, number 4, 1990, Epidemiological studies of the non-specific effects of vaccines: II –
methodological issues in the design and analysis of cohort studies, Open University, N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1397-1402, November 24, 1994).
There have been a couple of studies looking at risk factors for allergy that weren’t specifically about vaccines that looked at the health of Steiner children (a large proportion of whom are unvaccinated and use alternative medicine) and they found that they have less allergies and fewer doctor visits.
Another problem is that when researchers test whether a new vaccine causes any more disease than in the normal population they don’t test disease rates against unvaccinated children, they test them against the general population. Since the vast majority of the public are vaccinated, they are essentially testing the study group against itself. If the rest of the population are neurologically damaged, it’s not going to seem as if the test vaccines cause a spike in neurological illnesses.